Table of Contents
Ever felt the electric tension of a high-stakes diplomatic summit, where a single misstep could unravel months of careful alliance-building? That’s the magnetic pull of political strategy games centered on intense negotiation. Forget simple rock-paper-scissors combat; these experiences plunge you into the intricate web of backroom deals, fragile coalitions, and the constant dance of persuasion where words are your sharpest weapon and trust is the rarest commodity. It’s where victory hinges not on the size of your army, but on the cunning of your compromises and the precision of your promises. In a world craving deeper social interaction and complex human dynamics within gaming, this niche has exploded, moving far beyond basic trade agreements into realms of psychological maneuvering and emergent storytelling driven purely by player interaction.
As we step into 2026, the landscape for these negotiation-focused political sims is more vibrant and sophisticated than ever. Advancements in AI are creating non-player factions with eerily believable motivations and memory, while robust multiplayer frameworks foster global communities of master tacticians. But with so many options vying for your attention and precious playtime, how do you cut through the noise to find the experience that delivers genuine depth without draining your wallet? This guide cuts past fleeting hype and superficial lists. We’ll dissect the core elements that transform a simple strategy game into a captivating negotiation crucible, focusing squarely on identifying long-term value, meaningful player agency, and the features that ensure every session feels uniquely intense and replayable. It’s about investing in an experience that rewards your time and intellect, not just your credit card.
Top 10 Political Strategy Games
Detailed Product Reviews
1. Beacon Political Trump Game Build That Wall | Easy to Learn and Outrageously Fun for Teens & Adults Alike | 2-6 Players Ages 13+
Overview:
This satirical strategy game tasks players with building a wall and accumulating points through political maneuvering. Designed for quick setup and accessible rules, it targets fans of political humor and lighthearted competition, ideal for casual game nights with teens or adults.
What Makes It Stand Out:
Its rapid learning curve and overtly topical theme create immediate engagement. The blend of simple resource collection (bricks, policy cards) with playful sabotage mechanics—like “Obstruction” cards that delay opponents—adds strategic tension without complexity. The bold theme resonates strongly with politically engaged groups.
Value for Money:
Priced moderately for a niche party game, it delivers solid replayability through variable player powers and chaotic interactions. While lacking the depth of heavier strategy games, it justifies its cost as a dedicated icebreaker for political enthusiasts, outperforming generic party games in thematic cohesion.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Pros: Effortless to teach; high replayability with 2–6 players; sparks lively debate; compact components.
Cons: Humor leans heavily on one political perspective, limiting broad appeal; strategy depth is shallow; theme may alienate some groups.
Bottom Line:
A fun, accessible party game for politically aligned crowds seeking laughter over depth. Avoid if seeking neutrality, but recommended for groups who enjoy provocative, fast-paced competition with minimal rules overhead.
2. SHASN The Political Strategy Board Game for Adults and Children | 14+ Years | Epic Game of Politics, Ethics and Strategy | 3-5 Players | Multicolor
Overview:
SHASN is an award-winning political simulation where players compete in national elections through policy decisions, resource management, and voter influence. Praised for its thematic richness, it merges ethical dilemmas with strategic depth for mature audiences.
What Makes It Stand Out:
Its acclaimed design balances narrative immersion with intricate mechanics—players draft policies, manipulate headlines, and navigate “scandals” that alter gameplay. The infinitely variable ideology system (via power combinations) ensures no two games play alike, while stunning artwork elevates the unboxing experience.
Value for Money:
Positioned at a premium price, SHASN justifies cost through exceptional production quality (wooden tokens, foil boards) and near-limitless replayability. It outshines cheaper strategy games with its award-winning depth but may feel steep for casual players.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Pros: Deep, replayable strategy; gorgeous components; masterful theme integration; critical acclaim.
Cons: Steep learning curve; 90–120 minute runtime; complex rules may overwhelm newcomers; high price point.
Bottom Line:
A top-tier political strategy game for dedicated hobbyists seeking depth and thematic brilliance. Worth the investment for replay value and craftsmanship, though less suitable for families or casual gamers due to complexity.
3. [Pluto Games] President Maker – Political Strategy Board Game & Election Simulation | Tabletop Strategy Card Game for Adults & Teens | 2-4 Players | 45 Minute Playtime | Ages 14+ (English Edition)
![[Pluto Games] President Maker – Political Strategy Board Game & Election Simulation | Tabletop Strategy Card Game for Adults & Teens | 2-4 Players | 45 Minute Playtime | Ages 14+ (English Edition)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41LQk0OV0XL._SL160_.jpg)
Overview:
President Maker simulates a Korean presidential election across regional boards, blending area control with a unique vote-counting mechanic. Players campaign through policy cards while managing risk in a tight 45-minute runtime.
What Makes It Stand Out:
The ingenious “Vote Bag” system—where support tokens are drawn randomly based on engagement—creates nail-biting uncertainty, mirroring real electoral volatility. Three distinct phases (Rally, Political Action, Media) and risk/reward card play add layered strategy rarely seen in shorter games.
Value for Money:
Competitively priced for its robust component suite (wooden meeples, cloth bag, multiple boards), it offers exceptional replayability via randomized policy cards. Surpasses similar-priced games in thematic innovation and consistent 45-minute sessions.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Pros: Revolutionary vote-counting mechanic; sharp 45-minute playtime; high strategic depth; excellent regional board design.
Cons: Niche Korean political context may confuse some; Risk Card penalties feel punishing; setup requires careful token placement.
Bottom Line:
A must-buy for strategy fans craving fresh election mechanics. Its blend of tension, replayability, and concise gameplay makes it a standout, despite minor thematic barriers for non-Korean audiences.
4. Mindmade Debatable - A Hilarious Party Game for People who Love to Argue
Overview:
Debatable transforms players into opportunistic politicians arguing absurd or provocative topics (e.g., “Do foil hats block mind control?”). Using strategy cards like “Deny Everything,” it rewards creative persuasion in 3–16-player free-for-alls.
What Makes It Stand Out:
The game thrives on its boundary-pushing topics and flexible argument tactics, encouraging players to defend any position hilariously. Its inclusive player count and minimal setup make it ideal for large, rowdy gatherings where wit trumps expertise.
Value for Money:
An affordable party staple, it maximizes laughs per dollar with simple rules and endless topic combinations. Outperforms pricier games in social engagement but offers no strategic depth—pure comedic value drives its worth.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Pros: Unmatched for large groups; sparks hilarious moments; easy to learn; diverse topic range.
Cons: Topics risk offending sensitive players; zero strategic depth; replayability hinges on group chemistry; weak component quality.
Bottom Line:
Perfect for confident, close-knit groups who relish edgy humor and spontaneous debate. Skip if your circle prefers neutral themes, but highly recommended for fostering laughter and lively interaction.
5. Secret Hitler
Overview:
A social deduction classic where players are Liberals or Fascists racing to control the government. Hidden roles and secret envelopes fuel deception as players pass policies while identifying the hidden “Hitler” among them.
What Makes It Stand Out:
Its streamlined 8–10 minute rounds and emphasis on psychological manipulation create unmatched tension. The “envelope” system for private roles and the escalating policy board heighten paranoia, making every accusation feel consequential.
Value for Money:
Excellent value with durable wooden components and foil boards. At this price, it outperforms newer deduction games in replayability and group engagement, though component count is modest for 5–10 players.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Pros: Unbeatable social tension; quick setup/playtime; scales perfectly for large groups; timeless design.
Cons: Role imbalance slightly favors Fascists; repetitive after 10+ plays; requires vocal players; theme may discomfort some.
Bottom Line:
An essential party game for deduction fans, offering intense, accessible fun. Its minor flaws are overshadowed by enduring appeal—buy it if you enjoy bluffing and group dynamics, but ensure all players are comfortable with the theme.
6. Hasbro Gaming Avalon Hill Diplomacy Cooperative Board Game, European Political Themed Strategy Game, Ages 12 and Up, 2-7 Players
Overview: Diplomacy is a classic, pure-strategy board game set in pre-World War I Europe, where seven players embody major European powers vying for territorial dominance through negotiation, not dice rolls. It’s a deeply social, zero-luck experience demanding cunning diplomacy and alliance management. What Makes It Stand Out: Its brilliance lies entirely in player interaction—success hinges on persuasive negotiation, broken promises, and strategic betrayals. The absence of randomness forces pure tactical and interpersonal skill, while the 315-piece set (fleets, armies, markers) creates a richly detailed, immersive map of historical Europe. Value for Money: Priced moderately for a strategy game, its longevity stems from infinite replayability driven by human dynamics. While the 6-hour playtime may deter casual gamers, dedicated strategy enthusiasts will find exceptional value in its depth and the sheer unpredictability of each session compared to luck-based alternatives. Strengths and Weaknesses: Strengths: Unmatched emphasis on negotiation and social strategy; highly replayable due to player-driven outcomes; physically robust components. Weaknesses: Extremely lengthy playtime; susceptible to kingmaking or early elimination; requires 5+ committed players for optimal experience; lacks solo/cooperative modes. Bottom Line: A timeless, demanding masterpiece for hardcore strategy fans who relish intense social maneuvering. Not for the impatient or those preferring luck elements, but unparalleled for groups seeking a deep, purely cerebral political challenge that tests trust and cunning.
7. Vuca Simulations | New Cold War: 1989–2019 | Board Game | Card-Driven Geopolitical Strategy Wargame | 1–4 Players | Solo & Team Modes
Overview: New Cold War simulates 30 years of modern geopolitical conflict (1989-2019) where players command superpowers (USA, EU, China, Russia) navigating real historical events. This card-driven wargame emphasizes strategy, asymmetric powers, and historical accuracy over luck. What Makes It Stand Out: Its deep integration of 135 real-world event cards (from the Berlin Wall fall to COVID-19) creates an authentic historical simulation. Asymmetric superpower mechanics, combined with flexible play modes (solo AI, 2v2 teams, competitive 4-player), offer immense strategic variety and replayability unmatched in modern geopolitical gaming. Value for Money: Positioned as a premium strategy title, it justifies its cost through exceptional depth, high-quality components, and extensive solo/team functionality. For history buffs and strategy gamers, it offers significantly more nuanced gameplay per dollar than simpler thematic alternatives, though casual players may find it overwhelming. Strengths and Weaknesses: Strengths: Rich historical immersion; excellent solo AI; highly replayable due to asymmetry; sophisticated yet streamlined mechanics. Weaknesses: Steep learning curve; 150-180 minute playtime may deter some; theme may not appeal to non-history enthusiasts; limited physical components relative to complexity. Bottom Line: An outstanding, deeply strategic experience for serious board gamers and history lovers. Its historical rigor, flexible play modes, and asymmetric design make it a top-tier investment for those seeking a challenging, intellectually stimulating wargame.
8. Z-Man Games Planet B | Political Strategy Game | Futuristic Sci-Fi Game for Adults & Family Game Night | Ages 14+ | 2-4 Players | 60-180 Min Playtime
Overview: Planet B casts players as corrupt governors vying for control of a newly discovered exoplanet through city-building, worker placement, and dark political maneuvering. This sci-fi strategy game blends resource management with satirical take on political grift and corporate collusion. What Makes It Stand Out: Its unique fusion of worker placement with “corruption” mechanics—where every action costs influence or funds—creates deliciously Machiavellian choices. The dark humor throughout, combined with accessible city-building and a tight 60-180 minute runtime (scaling with player count), makes political scheming surprisingly approachable. Value for Money: Offers solid value for strategy fans, with high-quality components and strong replayability through variable player powers and objectives. While pricier than light party games, its depth and thematic richness provide better long-term engagement than many mid-weight strategy games in its class. Strengths and Weaknesses: Strengths: Clever corruption mechanic adds strategic depth; dark humor enhances theme; streamlined rules for its complexity; excellent player interaction. Weaknesses: Luck-dependent event cards can frustrate; endgame scoring feels abrupt; limited tactical variety in city layouts; theme may overshadow mechanics for some. Bottom Line: A witty, engaging strategy game perfect for fans of political satire and accessible worker placement. Its dark charm and meaningful choices make it a standout for game nights, though light gamers might prefer less cutthroat alternatives.
9. Niche Nation Games Overlap - Award-Winning Deceptively Simple Strategy Card Game for Adults and Families - 2 Player Game or Up to 8 Players - Easy to Learn Mensa Recommended Brain Game
Overview: Overlap merges Uno’s speed with Tetris-like spatial reasoning, challenging players to discard cards by matching overlapping colors/shapes. This fast-paced card game scales effortlessly from 2 to 8 players, emphasizing quick thinking and tactical anticipation in a visually intuitive package. What Makes It Stand Out: Its genius lies in simplicity—rules take under 2 minutes to learn, yet spatial strategy creates surprising depth. The Mensa recommendation is well-earned, as players must constantly reassess overlapping possibilities. High player count flexibility (2-8) and rapid 10-15 minute rounds make it universally accessible. Value for Money: An exceptional value proposition. The compact deck delivers immense replayability through pure skill-based variability, outlasting many pricier games. For families or groups seeking a quick, brain-teasing filler, it’s hard to beat its cost per hour of strategic fun and social engagement. Strengths and Weaknesses: Strengths: Effortless to learn; scales perfectly for any group size; sharp spatial strategy; award-winning educational benefits; highly portable. Weaknesses: Minimal thematic engagement; luck of the draw can occasionally dominate; lacks long-term progression; not deep enough for hardcore strategy gamers. Bottom Line: A brilliantly simple, universally appealing card game that excels as a party staple or family favorite. Its perfect blend of accessibility and Mensa-worthy strategy makes it a must-have for any game collection seeking quick, clever fun.
10. Kings Coalition - Royal Court Strategy Card Game Where Players Build Political Power and Unite Classes in The Kingdom for 2-4 Players by Play To Z
Overview: Kings Coalition is a competitive card game where players build royal courts by collecting subjects across four social classes (Nobles, Clergy, Merchants, Peasants) to score points through sets, sequences, and strategic alliances, aiming to become the king’s chief advisor. What Makes It Stand Out: Its innovative dual-path scoring—collecting full class sets or building ascending sequences within a class—creates dynamic, high-stakes hand management. The “bonus opportunities” mechanic, triggered as classes grow, adds delightful unpredictability and constant tactical pivots during play. Value for Money: Priced accessibly for a strategy card game, it delivers remarkable depth through its elegant mechanics. While lighter than eurogames, its focused 20-30 minute runtime, high replayability, and lack of luck elements offer better value per minute than many filler games with similar price points. Strengths and Weaknesses: Strengths: Ingenious dual-scoring system; fast-paced yet strategic; strong player interaction via shared bonuses; easy to teach; excellent replayability. Weaknesses: Limited player count (max 4); theme feels generic; hand management can become overwhelming late-game; minimal component quality. Bottom Line: A sharp, engaging card game that masterfully blends set collection and sequencing. Ideal for fans of quick strategic duels, it’s a worthy addition to any collection seeking replayable, brain-teasing competition without complexity overload.
Understanding the Core Appeal of Negotiation-Centric Strategy
Defining the Negotiation Gameplay Loop
True negotiation-focused strategy revolves around a continuous cycle: assessing positions, proposing terms, reading opponent cues (verbal or systemic), adapting tactics, and sealing agreements. It’s not merely trading resources; it’s about leveraging information asymmetry, understanding hidden agendas, and knowing when to bluff or concede. The most compelling systems create pressure points where every decision ripples through the political landscape, forcing dynamic recalibration of your strategy based on evolving trust levels and shifting power dynamics.
Why Negotiation Depth Trumps Simple Mechanics
Superficial “talk then trade” mechanics quickly grow stale. Deep negotiation value comes from systems offering layered choices – multiple possible concessions, varying degrees of commitment (binding treaties vs. shaky promises), and consequences that feel earned and logical. Look for games where the negotiation interface itself provides meaningful feedback, perhaps through visual stress indicators on AI leaders or subtle shifts in dialogue tone, making the process feel less like menu navigation and more like genuine persuasion.
The Critical Role of Player Agency in Deals
Your ability to craft unique solutions is paramount. Value diminishes rapidly if negotiations are funneled into rigid, pre-defined options. High-value experiences provide flexible frameworks: the freedom to bundle disparate resources, offer future favors, include sunset clauses, or even propose entirely novel terms within the game’s logic. This agency transforms negotiation from a chore into a creative puzzle, where your diplomatic ingenuity directly shapes the game’s outcome.
Evaluating Long-Term Value in Political Strategy Games
Assessing Replayability Through Dynamic Systems
The true mark of value isn’t just the first playthrough, but how many distinct political dramas you can stage. Prioritize games with robust procedural generation for faction personalities, starting conditions, and map layouts. Systems where AI factions develop long-term grudges, remember past betrayals, or form unexpected historical alliances based on emergent gameplay significantly extend lifespan, ensuring no two campaigns play alike.
The Impact of Community and Modding Support
A vibrant modding scene is often the secret sauce for enduring value. Check if the game has a strong workshop presence offering new factions, historical scenarios, or even overhauled negotiation mechanics. Active developer support for mod tools and community events signals a game designed to evolve, adding years of fresh content and strategic possibilities far beyond the base purchase price.
Measuring Depth Against Learning Curve
Beware the trap of complexity masquerading as depth. High-value games present their intricate systems accessibly, with intuitive tutorials that gradually layer mechanics without overwhelming. The best strike a balance: offering enough strategic nuance to satisfy veterans after dozens of hours, while providing clear pathways for newcomers to grasp core diplomatic principles and start making meaningful deals quickly. Steep, opaque learning curves often lead to abandoned games, negating any potential value.
Essential Features for Intense Negotiation Experiences
Realistic Faction Motivations and Memory
AI opponents must feel like thinking entities, not predictable algorithms. High-value games implement deep motivation systems where factions have clear, understandable (though not always transparent) goals, cultural biases, and historical contexts influencing their decisions. Crucially, they must remember your actions – honoring treaties builds trust, broken promises create lasting suspicion, and consistent behavior shapes their perception of you, making every interaction feel consequential.
Flexible Deal-Brokering Mechanics
Move beyond simple resource swaps. Look for systems allowing multi-party negotiations, conditional agreements (“I’ll support your claim if you back my trade route”), and non-material concessions like diplomatic recognition, military access, or intelligence sharing. The ability to craft bespoke deals, even with imperfect information, is what transforms negotiation from a transaction into a core strategic pillar and the primary engine of gameplay.
Meaningful Consequences and Betrayal Systems
Negotiation loses all tension if agreements are easily broken without severe repercussions. Value shines in games with sophisticated betrayal mechanics: immediate military backlash, cascading diplomatic isolation, loss of hard-earned trust metrics, or even triggering unique narrative events. The risk must feel real, making every promise a weighty decision and every deal a potential double-edged sword.
Platform and Performance Considerations for Value
Cross-Platform Play and Save Compatibility
If multiplayer negotiation is central to your enjoyment, seamless cross-platform functionality is non-negotiable for maximizing value. Being locked to one ecosystem drastically reduces your potential pool of skilled opponents and allies. Similarly, cloud saves ensure your intricate, weeks-long diplomatic campaign isn’t lost if you switch devices, protecting your time investment.
Optimized Performance for Long Sessions
Political strategy games demand sustained focus during marathon negotiation sessions. Prioritize titles known for stability and smooth performance, especially at high player counts or in late-game complexity spikes. Frequent crashes, crippling slowdowns during critical summits, or excessive loading times between diplomatic actions erode enjoyment and waste your most valuable resource: time.
Accessibility of Updates and Patches
Regular, meaningful developer updates signal ongoing value. Look for studios with a proven track record of refining negotiation mechanics, balancing faction AI, and adding quality-of-life features based on community feedback post-launch. A game actively improved over years offers significantly more long-term bang for your buck than a static release, even if the initial price is slightly higher.
Navigating the 2026 Market for Smart Investment
Identifying Sustainable Monetization Models
Beware predatory practices disguised as “value.” The best models focus on expanding the core experience ethically: major DLCs adding new eras or complex diplomatic systems, cosmetic packs with no gameplay advantage, or robust free updates. Avoid games where critical negotiation features, faction variety, or essential mechanics are locked behind excessive microtransactions or paywalls that cripple the base game’s depth.
Leveraging Free Trials and Demos Wisely
Many strategy titles now offer substantial free prologue campaigns or limited-time demos. Treat these as crucial testing grounds specifically for the negotiation feel. Can you grasp the deal-making interface quickly? Do the AI factions react in believable, varied ways? Does the stakes feel high even in a short session? A demo that excels in these areas is a strong indicator of long-term value.
Community Health as a Value Indicator
A thriving, constructive community forum or Discord server is invaluable. It’s where you’ll find guides for mastering complex diplomacy, discover player-created house rules enhancing negotiation, and get timely help with mechanics. More importantly, observe how developers interact with the community. Responsive support and visible engagement with player feedback on negotiation balance are strong signs the game will retain and grow its value over time.
Maximizing Your Investment Through Smart Play
Mastering the Art of Information Gathering
Value isn’t just in buying the game, but in playing it deeply. Dedicate time to learning the hidden metrics: what truly drives each faction’s decisions? What information can you leak strategically? The most valuable games reward meticulous observation and intelligence sharing (or manipulation) as core negotiation tools, turning every interaction into a potential data point for future advantage.
Building and Leveraging Diplomatic Capital
Treat trust and reputation as tangible currencies. High-value experiences allow you to invest in relationships – through consistent honesty, fulfilling minor requests, or strategic displays of strength – building capital you can spend during critical negotiations for better terms or to call in favors. Understanding how to accumulate and wisely deploy this capital is key to sustained success and replayability.
Embracing Asymmetric Playstyles
True depth lies in supporting vastly different diplomatic approaches. Does the game allow you to thrive as a cunning broker of peace, a feared warmonger using threats as leverage, or a neutral power profiting from others’ conflicts? High-value titles provide balanced pathways for diverse negotiation styles, ensuring the game remains engaging no matter your preferred political persona, significantly boosting long-term appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What defines a “negotiation-focused” political strategy game versus a general strategy game?
It prioritizes player-to-player or player-to-AI diplomatic interaction as the primary path to victory, with mechanics deeply embedded in deal-making, alliance management, and persuasion, rather than relegating diplomacy to a secondary menu option after military conquest.
How can I tell if a game has deep negotiation mechanics before purchasing?
Look for detailed developer blogs or community discussions specifically highlighting dynamic deal terms, AI memory of past interactions, consequences for broken treaties, and examples of emergent diplomatic stories created by players.
Is multiplayer essential for the best negotiation experience?
While single-player with sophisticated AI can offer strong value, the deepest, most unpredictable, and intense negotiation dynamics almost always emerge from human opponents in multiplayer, where psychology and bluffing reach their peak.
What’s the biggest red flag for poor negotiation value?
Rigid, menu-driven trading with no flexibility, AI factions that reset relationships every turn or ignore past betrayals, and a lack of meaningful consequences for diplomatic actions, making deals feel inconsequential.
How important is historical accuracy for negotiation depth?
It depends on preference. Some value historically grounded motivations and constraints for realism, while others prefer fictional settings allowing for more creative, abstract, or exaggerated diplomatic systems focused purely on gameplay depth.
Can solo players find long-term value in these games?
Absolutely, but only if the AI negotiation systems are exceptionally deep, with factions displaying believable personalities, long-term memory, and adaptive strategies that create consistently challenging and dynamic diplomatic landscapes over many playthroughs.
What role does game speed play in negotiation intensity?
Optimal pacing is crucial. Too slow, and the momentum of a tense negotiation dies; too fast, and you can’t properly assess options or read cues. The best games allow pausing during talks or offer adjustable speeds to match the high-stakes rhythm of deal-making.
How do I assess if a game’s learning curve is worth the investment?
Seek out detailed “first 10 hours” gameplay videos focusing specifically on the negotiation interface and early diplomatic challenges. Does it seem intuitive yet layered? Does the complexity unfold organically through play?
Are complex UIs necessary for deep negotiation systems?
Not necessarily. The highest-value games often feature UIs that elegantly simplify complex underlying systems, making the negotiation process clear and focused, minimizing clutter so the psychological and strategic elements remain the spotlight.
What’s the best way to maximize replayability in these games?
Embrace different faction roles with unique diplomatic strengths/weaknesses, utilize mods for new scenarios, set personal challenges (e.g., “win without signing any military pacts”), and actively seek out diverse human opponents with varying playstyles in multiplayer.
See Also
- How to Solve Boring Gameplay with the 10 Best Political Strategy Games in 2026
- 10 Best Value Abstract Strategy Games for Game Night Variety in 2026
- 10 Best Value Strategy Board Games for Deep Gameplay in 2026
- 10 Top-Rated Political Strategy Games According to Experts in 2026
- 10 Must-Have Political Strategy Games for Fans of Diplomacy in 2026